Phenotypical, genotypical and pathological characterization of the moonwalker mouse, a model of ataxia.

We performed a comprehensive study of the morphological, functional, and genetic features of moonwalker (MWK) mice, a mouse model of spinocerebellar ataxia caused by a gain of function of the TRPC3 channel. These mice show numerous behavioral symptoms including tremor, altered gait, circling behavior, impaired motor coordination, impaired motor learning and decreased limb strength. Cerebellar pathology is characterized by early and almost complete loss of unipolar brush cells as well as slowly progressive, moderate loss of Purkinje cell (PCs). Structural damage also includes loss of synaptic contacts from parallel fibers, swollen ER structures, and degenerating axons. Interestingly, no obvious correlation was observed between PC loss and severity of the symptoms, as the phenotype stabilizes around 2 months of age, while the cerebellar pathology is progressive. This is probably due to the fact that PC function is severely impaired much earlier than the appearance of PC loss. Indeed, PC firing is already impaired in 3 weeks old mice. An interesting feature of the MWK pathology that still remains to be explained consists in a strong lobule selectivity of the PC loss, which is puzzling considering that TRPC is expressed in every PC. Intriguingly, genetic analysis of MWK cerebella shows, among other alterations, changes in the expression of both apoptosis inducing and resistance factors possibly suggesting that damaged PCs initiate specific cellular pathways that protect them from overt cell loss.

Development of a next generation risk assessment framework for the evaluation of skin sensitisation of cosmetic ingredients.

All cosmetic products placed onto the market must undergo a risk assessment for human health to ensure they are safe for consumers, including an assessment of skin sensitisation risk. Historically, in vivo animal test methods were used to identify and characterise skin sensitisation hazard, however non-animal and other new approach methodologies (NAMs) are now the preferred and mandated choice for use in risk assessment for cosmetic ingredients. The experience gained over the last three decades on how to conduct risk assessments based upon NAMs has allowed us to develop a non-animal, next generation risk assessment (NGRA) framework for the assessment of skin sensitisers. The framework presented here is based upon the principles published by the International Cooperation on Cosmetic Regulation (ICCR) and is human relevant, exposure led, hypothesis driven and designed to prevent harm. It is structured in three tiers and integrates all relevant information using a weight of evidence (WoE) approach that can be iterated when new information becomes available. The initial tier (TIER 0) involves a thorough review of the existing information including; identification of the use scenario/consumer exposure; characterisation of the chemical purity and structure; in silico predictions; existing data pertaining to skin sensitisation hazard (historical or non-animal); the identification of suitable read-across candidates with supporting hazard identification/characterisation information and application of exposure-based waiving. Considering all information identified in TIER 0, the next step is the generation of a hypothesis (TIER 1). All data are considered in an exposure-led WoE approach, taking into account an initial view on whether a chemical is likely to be a skin sensitiser or not, choice of defined approach (DA) and availability of read-across candidates. If existing information is insufficient for concluding the risk assessment, the generation of additional information may be required to proceed (TIER 2). Such targeted testing could involve refinement of the exposure estimation or generation of data from in vitro or in chemico NAMs. Once sufficient information is available, the final stage of the NGRA framework is the determination of a point of departure (POD), characterising uncertainty and comparing to the consumer exposure in a WoE. Thorough evaluation of the sources of uncertainty is essential to ensure transparency and build trust in new risk assessment approaches. Although significant progress has been made, industry must continue to share its experience in skin sensitisation NGRA via case studies to demonstrate that this new risk assessment approach is protective for consumers. Dialogue and collaboration between key stakeholders, i.e. risk assessors, clinicians and regulators are important to gain mutual understanding and grow confidence in new approaches.